In a departure from the previous theme, we focused this week on Easter revision. Eduard collected everyone’s plans and classified them as either focusing on when to revise, or what to revise. Some of us were chosen to present our plans to everyone else. Here’s the selection of the more memorable moments from the presentations.
When, Middle Level of Detail: Ben
Ben planned to do eight hours of work per day… on his dissertation alone. Not to mention revision for his final year exams and a three-day rowing trip. While he sketched out a rough work schedule – in sufficient detail to identify daily targets – he retained enough freedom to juggle sessions around as necessary.
When, High Level of Detail: Andy
Andy planned in great detail each hour of his day, segmenting it into blocks of exactly 1 hour 35 minutes. Andy’s plan should ensure that he stays on track, and can just run on autopilot from this stage onwards.
Image: Andy’s incredibly detailed plan.
When, Low Level of Detail: Alex no. 1
Alex started off by asserting that he was a great “believer in freedom”, and so it’s no surprise that his plan left plenty of room for improvisation. This should allow him to vary his schedule on a day-to-day basis, as per his mood.
What: Alex no. 2
Everyone was dazzled by his three page plan written in LaTeX — until he mentioned that “none of this is the actual plan.” Fortunately, he did seem to have a good alternative plan, relying heavily on tripos questions (“Java questions are jolly useful”) to revise. This is a good strategy to get to understand the style of tripos questions and cover the material at the same time.
Image: An extract from Alex’s plan written in LaTeX.
Henry emphasised the importance of taking a break, planning in a week of gliding. Cambridge can be lot of hard work, and it’s vital to take some time off to be able to focus fully during term-time.
Radu used fancy fitting algorithms to slot his study sessions into his timetable. Wisely, he prioritised the courses he needed by assigning them the most number of sessions. The Part II dissertation was also once more a running theme.
How it can all go wrong: Eduard
To finish off, Eduard gave a demonstration of how a plan can go wrong, even for the best of us. Overall, the message was “be honest with yourself,” and keep a realistic set of goals in mind while revising over Easter.
Image: Eduard’s example (of what not to do) plan, including travel to Japan, FIFA, meeting with friends, and a worryingly small amount of time to work on his project.